How to respond to referee comments for scientific articles?

نویسندگان

  • Mustafa Serdar Kalemci
  • Burak Turna
چکیده

Currently, the increasing number of article submissions to scientific journals forces editors to be more selective in their acceptance of papers. Consequently, editors have increased the frequency of their use of scientific referee mechanisms. For many researchers, the publication of a scientific article in a high impact factor journal is a gradual and difficult process. After preparation and submission of a manuscript, one of the most important issue is responding to the comments of referees. However, there is a paucity of published reports in the literature describing how to respond to these comments. The aim of this review is to assist researchers/authors in responding to referee comments as part of the publication process for scientific articles.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication

Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...

متن کامل

انتشار تکراری: چالشی رو به رشد

During several years of cooperation with scientific journals in Iran as referee, member of editorial boards and editor in chief, I have faced with multiple non-ethical behaviors in publication. These days, I am witnessed to submitting articles to two or more journal simultaneously. Due to the growing pattern of this illegal action, this editorial will assess its dimensions and consequences....

متن کامل

نقش حمایتی سردبیران و داوران مجلات علمی

Expanding of research activities and results of these articles in scientific journals as well as the growing trend of researces by students will show the role of journals and especially referees of these journals. Although an article has written carelessly and superficially, it can be printed in journal with detailed comments of a consultant, therefore a referee like a supervisor can be helpful...

متن کامل

How to improve English articles writing methods

Introduction: Today, English and its use as an international language is agreed upon by all, and a wealth of scientific articles written every day in the whole world is in English. The purpose of this study is to project some commonly used grammatical points that native speakers of Persian, unfortunately, do not follow or do not have adequate knowledge to use when writing in English, but this s...

متن کامل

Reply to comments of Referee 3 and Referee 4 on the revised manuscript Quantifying the global atmospheric power budget by A. Makarieva et al. 1. Editor’s comments

I now have in hand two reviews of your revised manuscript. Unfortunately, neither of these is positive as they raise fundamental objections with the either the methodology or presentation. Reviewer 1 is concerned with either repetition or inaccurate characterization of Pauluis et al. (2000). Reviewer 2 is sympathetic with the effort and the contribution to the discussion but nonetheless disagre...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Turkish journal of urology

دوره 39 Suppl 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013